BCS Standings: November 8, 2009 + BCS Races and Analysis
Gaps in the standings indicate standings differences more than 0.06 in the standings.
Notes are made for the highest ranked teams from each conference, independents (ind), and all non-automatic qualifying conference members. (non-AQ)
Team must be in the top 14 to be eligible for a BCS at-large bid.
| Rank | Team | BCS Average | BCS Top 25 Teams Remaining | Notes |
| 1 | Florida | .9842 | Alabama | SEC #1 |
| 2 | Alabama | .9516 | Florida | |
| 3 | Texas | .9234 | None | Big 12 #1 |
| 4 | TCU | .8620 | Utah | MWC #1, non-AQ #1 |
| 5 | Cincinnati | .8580 | Pittsburgh, West Virginia | Big East #1 |
| 6 | Boise State | .8126 | None | WAC #1, non-AQ |
| 7 | Georgia Tech | .7552 | None | ACC #1 |
| 8 | LSU | .6138 | None | |
| 9 | USC | .5922 | Arizona | |
| 10 | Iowa | .5745 | Ohio State | Big Ten #1 |
| 11 | Ohio State | .5733 | Iowa | |
| 12 | Pittsburgh | .5628 | Cincinnati, West Virginia | |
| 13 | Oregon | .5318 | Arizona, Oregon State | PAC 10 #1 |
| 14 | Miami (FL) | .4712 | South Florida | |
| --- BCS Eligibility Line --- | ||||
| 15 | Houston | .4691 | None | C-USA #1, non-AQ |
| 16 | Utah | .4003 | TCU, BYU | non-AQ |
| 17 | Arizona | .3363 | USC, Oregon | |
| 18 | Penn State | .3350 | None | |
| 19 | Oklahoma State | .2909 | None | |
| 20 | Wisconsin | .2334 | None | |
| 21 | Virginia Tech | .2331 | None | |
| 22 | BYU | .1236 | Utah | non-AQ |
| 23 | Oregon St. | .1231 | Oregon | |
| 24 | South Florida | .1084 | Miami (FL) | |
| 25 | West Virginia | .0653 | Cincinnati, Pittsburgh | |
Number of top 25 teams per conference:
4: Big East, PAC 10, Big 10
3: SEC, MWC, ACC
2: Big 12
1: WAC, C-USA
0: MAC, Sun Belt
What this all means after the jump...
The standings managed to get a significant shake-up this week due to a large number of losses. The clusters of teams largely remain intact and moved up as teams fell around them.
Race to the National Championship Game
My estimated NCG lineups have changed slightly, mostly as a result of pruning the teams that have eliminated themselves. Also, The Big 12 has not been strong enough to boost Texas as I had anticipated and the SEC championship game participants have been set.
The second batch of teams would be close enough that public sentiment at the time of the final standings would have the final say.
- Florida
- Alabama
- Texas
- Florida with a loss
- Alabama with a loss
- Texas with a loss
- Cincinnati
- TCU
- Georgia Tech
- Boise State
Race to the BCS Automatic Qualifications
Currently only teams within one game behind are included. Other teams may still be able to win their conferences.
This much is certain: none of the conference races (except maybe C-USA) are anywhere near as complicated as the ACC was last year this time.
| ACC Atlantic | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Clemson | 4-2 | 0.0 | Maryland, Georgia Tech |
| Boston College | 3-2 | 0.5 | Clemson, Virginia Tech |
| ACC Coastal | |||
| Georgia Tech | 6-1 | 0.0 | Miami(FL) |
| Closest | 1.5 |
Georgia Tech appears to have clear sailing to the ACC Championship game, with Clemson's lead for the more competitive Atlantic division race solidifying.
| Big 12 North | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Kansas St. | 4-2 | 0.0 | Oklahoma, Texas Tech |
| Nebraska | 3-2 | 0.5 | Iowa State, Texas Tech |
| Big 12 South | |||
| Texas | 5-0 | 0.0 | None |
| Okklahoma St. | 4-1 | 1.0 | Texas |
Texas is in the solid lead in the South and Kansas State has a slight lead in the North. The Kansas State Nebraska rivalry game might end up becomming a Big 12 semifinal game.
| Big East | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Cincinnati | 5-0 | 0.0 | None |
| Pittsburgh | 5-0 | 0.0 | None |
The winner of this game will likely earn the Big East title and a BCS berth.
| Big 10 | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Iowa | 5-1 | 0.0 | Northwestern |
| Ohio St. | 5-1 | 0.0 | Purdue |
| Penn St. | 4-2 | 1.0 | Iowa, Ohio State |
| Wisconsin | 4-2 | 1.0 | Iowa, Ohio State |
The winner of the Ohio State Iowa game this week will have a commanding lead in the Big 10 race. Penn State and Wisconsin do not play this year.
If Ohio State defeates Iowa this week, both Rose Bowl participants will have at least two losses this year.
| PAC 10 | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Oregon | 5-1 | 0.0 | Stanford |
| Arizona | 4-1 | 0.5 | Washington |
| Stanford | 5-2 | 0.5 | Arizona, Oregon State |
| USC | 4-2 | 1.0 | Oregon, Washington |
| Oregon St. | 4-2 | 1.0 | Arizona, USC |
Stanfords upset of Oregon once again stirred the PAC 10 race. The Oregon-Arizona winner will have a clear shot at the Rose Bowl.
| SEC East | W-L | GB | Conference Losses |
| Florida (Clinched) | 7-0 | 0.0 | None |
| SEC West | |||
| Alabama (Clinched) | 6-0 | 0.0 | None |
With 2 games left and a three game lead we can call the SEC East for Florida now. The winner of the LSU-Alabama game will have the lead in the West and alabama could secure an insurmountable two game lead with the head to head tie breaker.
The race for the top non-automatic qualifying team
No change here this week. TCU has taken the lead for that spot reserved for those without a conference automatic qualification and will keep that lead unless they lose. Boise State is next in line. Utah can settle it on the field against TCU but would still need a Boise State loss. Houston would need a Boise State loss and a loss by the eventual winner of the TCU-Utah game to be guaranteed a spot. Even then, they might not be ahead of TCU.
Guarantee clause for #3 and #4 Spots
If Cincinnati loses and both TCU and Boise State win out, the loser of the SEC championship game could possibly fall to #5 and put TCU and Boise State at #3 and #4. A Georgia Tech loss might be needed as well. As it is currently worded, only teams from conferences with an automatic qualification would qualify for this exception. I frankly don't think this case was seriously entertained prior to my post last week and suspect that this rule may be clarified after the First Selection Teleconference on November 24th.
Either way, if this event happens and both don't get an invite things might get heated for the BCS folks. They might choose to avoid this and select the second as an at-large. Rumors of the Fiesta Bowl entertaining the thought of a Pointsettia Bowl rematch if Texas goes to the NCG and a second Big 12 team is not available have made the rounds.
The race for the three remaining the at-large berths
All teams in the top 20 should expect that winning their games is all they need to become eligible for a BCS berth.
Some interesting rules come into play if the top 14 become constrained due to the provision that a conference may not qualify a third team as an at-large selection. After the seven guaranteed spots discussed above only three BCS spots remain. This is unlikely as the SEC will qualify a second team and the Big 10 and PAC 10 look set to qualify one as well. The ACC and Big East could have an eligible team as well.
Should the automatic qualifying conferences fail to fill all these slots a second or even third team from outside the automatic qualifying conferences would likely be available this year.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
TCU/Boise
Rematch would suck. Plus I do not think it will happen because while that game would be good on the field the Fiesta would get the lowest ratings. Also, consider that the Sugar Bowl gets the last pick in the rotation and I think USC will get taken with either as their replacement loss for Texas in the NCG or as their second pick if Texas is not in the title game. I see a more likely SEC runner up vs. TCU in the Sugar then Boise vs. TCU Fiesta.
TCU/BSU
I thought their game last year was the best bowl game of the year. Well played on both sides, and each team’s defense played very, very well.
I agree, that it would not be a good scenario this year. Neither would be able to prove their worthiness if they had to play each other. They would both be better served playing against a 3rd place BCS team.
If I had to project the BCS bowls now:
NCG: SEC #1 vs. Texas
Rose: Oregon vs. Ohio State
Sugar: SEC #2 vs. Miami(FL)
Fiesta: TCU vs. USC
Orange: Georgia Tech vs. Cincinnati
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
2 ACC teams getting into the BCS?
I suppose it could happen since it is Miami. But yuck. I truly believe the MWC is better than the ACC, the Big East, and arguably the Big 10. Yes, I’m serious about the last one, and I am a Big 10 fan.
I feel like Boise State travels well. Aren’t they usually well represented at their bowls (even outside the Humanitarian Bowl)?
FYI, for the Big10, the Iowa/Ohio St game is the defacto CG. If Iowa beats Ohio St and then loses to Minnesota, they would have two conference losses (Northwestern, Minnesota) but would have the tiebreakers over the other 2 conference loss teams (Ohio St, Penn St, and Wisconsin).
If Ohio St beats Iowa and loses to Michigan (heaven forbid), they would have two conference losses (Purdue, Michigan) but would have tiebreakers over the other 2 loss teams (Iowa, Penn St, Wisconsin).
Good catch!
I had forgotten the Big 10 wraps up early. I left wiggle room open for either one losing two after winning that was not needed.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
How likely is it
that an unbeaten Cincinnati will pass an unbeaten Texas in the final BCS standings?
Right now, UC is less then .07 points behind Texas. While Texas has no top 25 teams left on its schedule, Cincinnati still has 2.
The gap between Texas and TCU is wider than the 0.07 indicates.
Basically the top three have already locked away some reserves from earlier big wins.
And reputation.
Cincinnati might pass Texas in the computers, but not the polls. I don’t see the gap closing further than 0.013 and that would require a TCU loss.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter
Give Me My Playoffs Please
if nothing changes, Texas Christian will get screwed (by not playing for the mythical “national championship”) and I’ll bet Cincy remains unbeaten, thus they’ll get screwed too. A playoff is desperately needed and hopefully Congress unites as one to decimate the BCS.
Brad James
You want to get congress involved?
Just saying if you thought the BCS was complicated, look was congress is doing to heath care and mandatory environmental policies. The NCAA isn’t much better.
A playoff is desperately needed, but the BCS is the organization that would best run one.
BCS Evolution -- Punctuating the Equilibrium - twitter








