Ok, so I was thinking ... on SB nation most Heisman race coverage features the given team page's candidate.  As a blog dedicated to college football in general I could provide a neutral Heisman perspective.

It almost seemed like a duty of this blog.

The issue is I think football is a team sport and I don't think individual awards make too much sense in that context.  Maybe for academic success, but not for on field performance.

Consider 2006.  Based on this years evidence it might have been better to have given the award to Percy Harvin, likewise to the Oklahoma line in 2008.

But people want to know as bad as I want to know the BCS standings.  Well, I can at least give a home for the conversation. Each week I will post a poll of the top 5 contenders.  The player with the lowest number of votes will drop out and I will look for a player to replace them.  Where will I look?  In the comments below, where else?

To start this off I will use the three former Heisman winners, Lou Holtz favorite Clausen and BCS computer favorite Iowa's QB.

I think that method is as ridiculous as the premise of the trophy itself.

Am I crazy?  Probably.  Tell me how below!  (Preferably regarding my selection methods and who I missed)